Knowing The Truth

Tag: pathology

  • Fluoride – Poison on Tap Full Documentary

    Fluoride – Poison on Tap Full Documentary

    This documentary is from a few years ago but if you haven’t seen it you won’t regret spending the time to go through this. It’s well worth your time and you’ll learn a ton about the history of this toxic substance and agency capture which has led to the soft kill poisoning of Americans for decades.

    As usual all our videos can be seen right away with nearly daily posting on our bitchute channel.

    Visit and subscribe here:
    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    Please share this with anyone you think will pay attention to it and share your feedback in the comments below.

  • Germ Theory Terrain Theory or Pleomorphism? Microbiome To The Rescue

    Germ Theory Terrain Theory or Pleomorphism? Microbiome To The Rescue

    Here’s an intro to the concepts of Germ Theory versus the Terrain Theory with a bonus on how pleomorphism fits into this puzzle in the last video clip below.

    A lot of the alternative media seems to be calling out anyone supporting the terrain theory with the accusation of sewing division into the truth community. I hear things like “In this time we need to be a team and go against the real enemy” referring to the globalists and elites.

    But isn’t the real enemy the lies and that we should stand above all else on truth?

    And at the same time the most cutting edge aspects of health are in the areas of the microbiome and epigenetics. Epigenetics is clearly a concept that the “thought police” don’t seem to want you to understand. It’s the concept that your environment and perceptions turn on and off your genes and lend credibility to the idea that genetics is nothing but eugenics without the understanding of epigenetics.

    And maybe the real truth is that the root of disease is “mostly” from a disruption in the commensal bacterial colony which IS your birthright. These are the communities of microbiology which you should be born with that are passed on from the mother to the child but disrupted by many factors including c-section births, antibiotics, etc.

    Another thing that I have heard attributed to Antoine Bechampe (considered by some to be the father of terrain theory) but which I can’t yet seem to confirm is that he said:

    with every failed theory comes an ounce of truth


    Instead the most famous quote that is confirmed from Bechampe is this one:

    “The most serious disorders may be provoked by the injection of living organisms into the blood, into a medium not intended for them, may provoke redoubtable manifestations of the gravest morbid phenomena.”

    This is obviously important in our current time of untested pharma products being pushed on the public for injection into the public.

    But if Bechampe really believed that every failed theory, the germ theory of disease for example, contained an ounce of truth doesn’t it really shed a lot of light on this debate between terrain theory and the germ theory of disease?

    Keep in mind that Bechampe was a contemporary to (and arguably a much more advanced scientist than) the famous scientist Louis Pasteur. Bechampe claimed Pasteur plagiarized his work but got it all wrong.

    Here’s a story from my life that brings some perspective on this subject from my life.

    I work out at home and use my elliptical with bare feet. If you’ve ever used an elliptical for long workouts you know that it gets pretty sweaty. Sadly I don’t find myself cleaning the foot trays after every sweaty workout. After a week or so it can get pretty grimy on those trays. If I don’t clean them at that point in the next day or two I’ll start getting a bit of itchy feet, often called “athletes foot” right?

    Does this mean that I’ve caught athletes foot from someone?

    One could only I argue that I caught it from myself!

    I would argue that the toxins that I sweated out would start to accumulate on the foot trays which start breeding a toxic environment that may include some bacteria and fungus which then find my epidermis to also be a good place to grow.

    The most important part to consider is the toxic component in contrast to a contagion component.

    I clean the trays when I notice that and a couple sprays with nano-ionic silver and the itchiness goes away. After all I got rid of the true source of the problem, the dirty foot trays and cleaned up my feet well.

    Getting to the core of the debate I like to reflect on the geoengineering component because ignoring what is so endemic in our environment is a catastrophic mistake. So if there are nano toxins being aerosolized and sprayed in our environment and that these could be the core issue with the lack of wellness in our culture, is there really a need for “contagion” in most disease conditions?

    After all what is an engineered, “gain of function” virus but a nano-toxin?

    I justify this statement in the understanding that a toxin is simply a substance which is not recognized as beneficial. Viruses are nano sized. Bio-engineer them and encapsulate them in lipid nano-particles for an injection vector (delivery) or aerosolize them for spraying in the environment and breathed into the lungs, regardless of the pathway it is recognized as a toxin and nothing more.

    This interview shares some updated information on this subject:

    This mini post was written to highligh two different perspectives going on right now in terms of understanding what we are dealing with in our environment and how it is affecting human blood.

    First is the concept of toxic blood as a result of toxic injections and possibly PCR tests and mask wearing in addition to possible “shedding” of toxins:

    This video is a clip from the full video which can be seen here.

    The other side of this gets into the concept of pleomorphism and the “pleomorphism in reverse” phenomena that seems to be going on in healthy blood and how this could be misinterpreted as being from toxic injections/shedding. In this case it’s argued that what you are seeing here in the blood is in fact pleomorphism in reverse with a discussion that this phenomena may in fact be what Royal Rife was seeing in his microscopes when he was disassociating microbials into debris or what Bechampe called microzyma:

    The videos here and many others can be seen on our bitchute channel where you can subscribe to get quicker notifications when we post videos (about 10-20 videos per week)

    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth

    Thanks for reading and watching. If you found this post to be helpful please share it with your friends and share your thoughts in the comments below.

     

    Featured Photo By EpicTop10.com
    Slide Image courtesy of: medicalmuseion

  • Who Is Controlled Opposition?

    Who Is Controlled Opposition?

    This topic of “Controlled Opposition” is a big can of worms and some of the videos I’ve been watching and posting lately have been digging into this philosophically in ways that I feel are worth articulating here…

    We did our first episode of MediaPuppets on this topic so I’ll embed that video on the bottom of this post.

    No matter where you are in your belief system it’s pretty easy to see that the mainstream narrative on Covid-19 has been falling apart for quite some time. The idea that “you should just get your vax and things will go back to normal” or at this point “get your booster and things will (finally) go back to normal” is largely being dismissed and this is even showing in the mainstream media these days.

    The narrative has been falling apart for quite some time but now it’s just patently obvious.

    Consider this recent story…

    So clearly the narrative is falling apart if pharma people are getting in serious trouble for falsifying vaccination records. Clearly the big wigs on the top are not taking these jabs but still trying to make you feel you should.

    When it comes to “Controlled Opposition” I believe there are many layers to the concept.

    At this point I break those down in two basic groups:

    • Economically Controlled
    • Philosophically (ideologically) Controlled
    • Blackmail Controlled

    For the purpose of focus, in this post we will focus on the first two and leave blackmail for other discussions.

    It’s my estimation that when most people think of “Controlled Opposition” (i.e. “Is this guy controlled opposition?”) think of someone who is paid to appose the narrative in a certain way. Paid opposition as a method of slowing down an inevitable collapse of a psychological narrative that is bound to fail as the truth spreads.

    So “they” (globalists, etc.) know that with so many people getting sick and dying from a novel experimental injection that was never tested on animals and only fraudulently “tested” on humans where the real results were actually hidden (and are finally coming out) that they will only be able to hide this reality for so long.

    They’ll use censorship in big-tech, gaslighting and big media for all their power but having certain doctors steering the alternative narrative can never hurt, right?

    Why not have some “alternative” doctors steer the narrative away from the topic of “bio-weapons” designed to kill and steer more towards the already accepted “side affects” of the vax such as myocarditis and other vascular conditions. This is sensible if you are an evil globalist with a penchant for depopulation and you want to delay your inevitable hanging in a Nuremberg 2.0 crimes against humanity trial.

    But what about the other method of control?

    After all when someone has been so indoctrinated into a particular viewpoint (case in point “the germ theory of disease”) it can be very difficult to steer them away from this view. It can go so far as defending their theories regardless of a lack of evidence. So this lack of proof of their viewpoint can be waved right in front of their face and they still won’t see it because they are so deeply entrenched in a particular bias.

    Lately there’s been some discussion going on indirectly between Dr Thomas Cowan and Dr Andrew Kaufman with Dr Peter McCullough and Dr Robert Malone. Here’s an example shown in a few short video clips so please bear in mind that these were from two distinct interviews and they didn’t actually engage in a direct debate.

    First we have Dr Robert Malone defending the viral theory of disease in the case of Covid and calling the virus an “agent” that has been identified and isolated:

    Next we have a clarification and an interesting metaphor from Dr Thomas Cowan about the actual methods used in viral “isolation” which are in reality not isolation at all:

    What follows is some defense against the idea that covid was simply a rebranding of the flu by Dr Peter McCullough with a few words also from Dr Robert Malone:

    Next is an explanation from Dr Andrew Kaufman explaining why it benefits the establishment to continue the narrative of a deadly and scary virus in order to spread fear to move the population towards Agenda 2030. He also explains Dr Stefan Lanka’s research where he produced cytopathic results without a virus just from the toxic soup of the “isolation” process:

    Of course one of the most common questions that comes up in the “Terrain Theory” debate is how other diseases that are thought to be caused by a virus actually caused?

    While this seems on the face of it to be a good question there’s an obvious answer which is articulated quite well right here:

    Open minds in medicine are quite rare because it’s hard to go against the grain in any endeavor especially in medicine when all of your peers are so indoctrinated into pharmaceutical medicine and the paradigm of pharma one medicine for every disease.

    This ideological control is one that doesn’t get the attention that it needs because this type of “Controlled Opposition” doesn’t even know they are acting in this way. They may be so indoctrinated into their particular paradigm that they don’t even know they are being manipulated with that paradigm. This is why paradigm shifts are so important.

    The bias of indoctrination creates the lens that you see the world through and the danger of this type of controlled opposition is that the individual doesn’t even know they are controlled by such a bias until something flips the switch and they have a paradigm switch. These days it’s often referred to as a “red pill”.

    Of course this digs at the core of terrain theory vs germ theory and whether “virus isolation” techniques actually qualify as “isolation” at all because of the toxic soup that is added to “culture” the small amounts of so called virus that are thus being cultured.

    I believe this is a very important debate and one that should involve a direct conversation between these apposing groups, that has not happened yet…

    However as mentioned above, Dr Stefan Lanka has done an experiment where he performed a “control” viral isolation where no virus was added to the culture and it looked basically the same after the toxic soup was cultured. Neither McCullough or Malone have commented directly on Dr Lanka’s work that I know of but please share a comment below if you know otherwise.

    So who is part of the controlled opposition?

    Dr Peter McCullough?

    Dr Robert Malone?

    Dr Ryan Cole?

    As Dr Tom Cowan so astutely points out that it’s a good habit to avoid questioning other peoples motives unless they expressly articulate those motives because otherwise it’s basically pure speculation because we can’t get inside their head.

    So while anyone can speculate that one or more of these doctors are part of an effort of controlled opposition based on the history of actions of each of these doctors risking their careers in the last couple years it’s more likely that they would be part of the ideological / philosophically controlled opposition than that they are being paid to oppose the narrative.

    But then again, maybe others out there have additional information on this that would indicate otherwise.

    What do you think?

    Which, if any of these doctors do you think is controlled opposition? And which type of control do you believe they are under?

    And where in this story does Monkeypox fit in?

    It is pretty clear that the skin lesions of shingles and other skin conditions that are a hallmark of immune dysfunction are similar to skin lesions of monkeypox. Immune suppression in the AIDS era in the 1980’s is now known to have been a result of immune-suppressive pharmaceuticals such as AZT and others. These were known to cause a skin condition called kaposi-sarcoma where the skin growths would stop when the patients were taken off the drugs.

    Knowing this would you think it would be productive to question the immune-suppressive qualities of a novel (new) experimental gene-therapy injection that is being falsely promoted and advertised as a “vaccine”?

    Could a condition being called “monkeypox” and blamed on skin to skin contact spread actually be a result of an adverse reaction to a gene-therapy injection?

    With the proper “Controlled Opposition” could the threat of monkeypox be used as a method to continue the narrative of the vaccine agenda in order to continue to push injections despite what is obvious to some of us as blatant injection reactions?

    Since this was a pretty serious post I’m going to close with a pretty funny video called “Gaslighting Me with PSYOPS” from Dr Clown at www.DrClown.com

    All our videos can be found on our bitchute channel where you can also subscribe for the latest videos:
    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    And the MediaPuppets on “Controlled Opposition”:

    Please share this post with your friends and spread the word. Also go ahead and subscribe below to get weekly notifications of our latest new content.

    Featured Photo By DES Daughter

  • Autopsies of Eight Deaths Within Two Weeks of Covid Shots – Part 1

    Autopsies of Eight Deaths Within Two Weeks of Covid Shots – Part 1

    Last week the doctor’s group in Germany released an English translated version of their press conference from Sept 20, 2021 where they reviewed the pathology of 8 people who had died within two weeks post covid shot. Some of these doctors also reviewed dozens or possibly around a hundred vials of the various covid 19 vaccine products under microscope.

    The press conference was quite long and rather difficult to go through but after watching it a couple times it was clear to me there was a huge amount of important information in this that needed to be edited for easier access. It was in two parts, the first being the pathology report from the autopsies and the second was the analysis of the actual vaccine vials under microscope.

    At this point I’ve edited 5 short clips which are mostly from the vaccine vial anaysis (see below) from this and will continue to edit more as I have time available.

    I’ve also been working on editing still images which are mostly from the pathology microscopy slides that were shown mostly during the first part of the press conference. There is a huge amount of still shots (mostly from the pathology part 1) that I’ve captured from the video (~150 in total) and I’ve started editing those as well and will show you some of those here once I go over the summary of what I got out of their press conference review of their data.

    My interpretation (I am not a doctor, so this is a lay persons perspective) is that what the pathologists saw in their autopsy research of these individuals is a consistent full body hyper inflammatory response as seen in the lymphocytes in multiple organs. The result of this massive inflammatory response is that the failure of organ systems is basically inevitable and the particular organs that fail will essentially just depend on the health status of each of the organs when this inflammatory response starts.

    What was seen system wide is the destruction of muscle cells and an infiltration of lympocytes (indicating inflammation).

    When we think about destruction of muscle cells and the heart you can start to realize why things like myocarditis are so serious. These muscle cells (of the heart) apparently don’t grow back or regenerate so degradation of these muscle systems will essentially lead to a weak or failing heart.

    The discussion among the pathologists seems to indicate that the inflammatory damage in the various organs shows a clear path to various disease syndromes such as myocarditis, endothelial (lining of blood vessels) dysfunction (some showed detached endotheium), lung, liver and kidney dysfunction and many other potentially life threatening conditions depending on the organ that is either the most affected or the weakest at the time of the injection of the poison.

    Regarding the examination of the Pfizer Biontech, Johnson & Johnson, and Astra Zeneca vials an important thing to understand is that what is being shown here is “double light shedding” which indicates that it is not biological. These anomalies were discussed with the doctors who asked if they had analyzed other (non-covid) vials and they had analyzed some other product vials and hadn’t found anything like this.

    Depending on the feedback I will either update this post or add additional parts to it as I get through the editing process but I would like to see a discussion start in the comments below and hope to hear opinions from some medical professionals who can corroborate the findings of these German and Austrian doctors.

    First I’ll share some of the videos I’ve edited, then move on to the pathology slide still images which I still have a lot of work to do on them and I apologize if any of them are labeled incorrectly I did my best and have just shared the names I put on them when I created them so there may be some inconsistencies.

    My edits are very short so far. Here’s the first video edit showing some very strange things from the seemingly toxic vials:

    The second video is from a J&J vial showing a strange moving triangular shaped object:

    The third video shows some live blood analysis post injection that displays the well known “rouleau” formation of stacked red blood cells which is representative of coagulated blood:

    The forth video starts with some more live blood analysis but then gets into a video display of the Pfizer Biontech product which was prepared in a unique way. They cooled the sample residue of the vial which then warms up under the light of the microscope and beomes very active as you can see. Also it shows some very strange shapes! Almost cartoon character looking.

    The fifth video is a bit longer and shows a number of anomalous objects that display the “double light shedding” phenomena (as most of the objects shown from the vials do. This one also shows some interesting chain formation that appears to be a single molecule wide. They don’t claim that they know what these chain-like objects are but it is interesting that graphene oxide is known to form layers of one molecule in thickness.

    Also shown are many metallic looking objects that are quite mobile moving all about the slide. This final video is much longer than the others and as I write this it is still processing by bitchute so if you don’t see a video below this please check back later and it will be here eventually.

    I’ve had some requests for video links to my source videos lately. Depending on where the videos are pasted from sometimes you can right click to discover that information. I would prefer if you would share my post directly since I spend a lot of time creating these posts and it can be more compelling to share it along with the context of the post.

    But these videos are from my bitchute channel where I’ll be posting a lot of videos moving forward:

    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    Now let’s examine some of the pathology slides.

    This first batch of images came from the discussion about myocarditis and the destruction of muscle fibers. Again these are pathology slides from deceased individuals who had recently been injected. The pathologists seemed to be in agreement that they could attribute 30-40% of the cause of death of these 8 autopsies to be a direct result of the injections based on their many years of experience and examining these cases.

    “Fall” is apparently German for subject or case # so the number represents the specific autopsy case.

    As I review these images more along with the original video (which you can see here) I’ll add more notes. This is only about 10-15% of the images that I’ve grabbed from my review of the original press conference. More will be posted for review as I work through the rest and I will also work on improving the size and resolution because these seem rather small.

    I do hope we have some medical professional review this and add in their commentary to continue the dialog.

    The black is apparently representative of the lymphocytes.

    Basically my understanding of what we are looking at with these slides is system wide inflammation which is rather extreme and not a normal phenomenon. In other words while some people may have inflammation it doesn’t typically look like this in a pathological review.

    I believe the two images below are representative of micro-blood clotting in small capillaries:

    I believe the slides below are cross sections of a blood vessel showing lyphocytes as well as some endothelial dysfunction.

    I believe this was described as “detached endothelium” because the endothelial lining of the blood vessel is supposed to be on the perimeter but here we can see it is no longer bound to the side of the vessel. This clearly could be a distinct reason for so many of the vascular issues we hear about as side effects of these shots.

    Thanks for visiting and reading. More to come!

    Please, please share your thoughts about these images and videos in the comments below whether it’s because you are a medical professional or not.

    And share this post everywhere to get the word out and help keep a grip on censorship.