Category: Health

  • Controlled Opposition, Ideological Bias and Paradigm Shifts

    Controlled Opposition, Ideological Bias and Paradigm Shifts

    Awhile back I wrote a few posts on Controlled Opposition and on one of them I broke down the different types of controlled opposition as I understand them.

    I broke down the types of controlled opposition into 3 categories:

    • Financially Controlled Opposition
    • Philosophically or Ideologically Controlled Opposition
    • Blackmailed Controlled Opposition

    You can read more about the basis for this in my original post here.

    The purpose of that original post was really just to get you to think about the people you follow and what may be influencing their sentiment, what they say and how they view “the truth”.

    This brought up some questions and even some concern by some of our subscribers who seemed to kind of misunderstand my point in thinking that I was calling out ideologically controlled opposition, who are quite literally indoctrinated into their belief system, as liars.

    My point was not to say that ALL controlled opposition publishers are liars. In fact the point was exactly the opposite!

    After all most people probably don’t think about the middle group and my argument is that they are NOT liars but in fact believe what they are conveying IS the truth when in fact they may be on the old side of a paradigm shift that the popular opinion is awakening to. You are of course welcome to disagree with this argument and type in some comments on this post about why you disagree but that is my argument.

    With this in mind here I’ll expand on the concepts of controlled opposition, opposition bias and paradigm shifts and how this relates to the court of public opinion and what we see as “truth”. Popular opinion is, after all the true voice of the people regardless of the potential conflict with a mainstream narrative.

    Every single one of you on this planet has a life trajectory that is unique to your life and what you go through and this creates your unique (cultural) bias which is essentially the lens you see the world through. The more cultures you are exposed to as you grow up the more diverse your cultural bias would be.

    This bias is not fixed, you can always change it if you are determined to accomplish this and do the work that is required to see the world in a new light. You might describe this as a type of pardigm shift that you’d experience in your life.


    If your career is oriented around science the individual mentors who you were exposed to would have a large influence on your scientific bias. This could be for better or worse depending on who you are mentored by and who you work with.

    Interestingly some that are exposed to extremely corrupt science such as was apparently the case with Dr Judy Mikovits and her work with Anthony Fauci can actually spin a rebellious bias against the corruption that has plagued the scientific community. In her case it catapulted her to reject mainstream corrupt science and write her series of books on the “Plague of Corruption”. One could argue Dr Mikovits had a paradigm shift in this outcome becoming quite the whistleblower about the ingredients in vaccines and other corruptions in medical practice.

    I feel that my upbringing and being influenced by my Dad, who is a very mainstream doctor, had a similar effect on me. This is at least partially why my bias had evolved many years ago into a hardened anti-pharma person that is also highly skeptical of what’s now often referred to as “scientism” (the concepts that science has turned into more of a religion with the scientific method being rejected in favor of the almighty dollar based on who is paying for the “research”). I guess that could be part of the reason that over these last few years I’ve consistently maintained my health throughout and never felt the need for even the praised ivermectin instead focusing on non-pharma natural, herbal and energy medicine.

    So I probably went through my paradigm shift decades ago when I moved to Oregon, which at the time was a bastion of natural health. Since then a great deal of the populace here has been co-opted to believe the decades long programming by what is lately being referred to a “liberal” media. The liberal media label may in fact be part of the divide and conquer strategy because really all mainstream media, no matter what the station’s call letters or whether they lean left or right, are in fact ALL sponsored in one way or another by Pfizer and Big Pharma. If the sponsorship is not direct the funding sources will always lead through the quagmire network of so called philanthropic foundations, which ultimately leads to the same Rockefeller or George Soros cartels of NGOs that sponsor state terrorism and regime change on a global scale.

    I believe culturally the entire world is going through a large scale version of this sort of paradigm shift right now due to the way of the “powers that be” responded to the covid-19 fiasco. It’s some sort of awakening which is multi-faceted but I believe the roots are in a large population base being shocked into realizing that the core scientific establishment is based on fraud.

    That rabbit hole is rather deep and different prominent doctors have gone down it to different levels and therefore express differing opinions on how they see the situation. The cultural bias lens that they see the world through is morphing in realtime as they do more and more “truth” interviews.

    Does it mean that these “respectable” doctors that may only be just below the surface of that rabbit hole are lying because they may not expose “the whole truth”?

    My answer to that would be absolutely not.


    We all have different beliefs and these may have something to do with how far down we’ve gone. Your beliefs may not be as extreme as mine. I was lucky to find an old copy of Jon Rappaport’s book “AIDS Inc.” at an estate sale in the 1990’s and it definitely opened me up early to just how corrupt pharma can be and how long lasting public opinion can be influenced by corruption. After all most of our population didn’t realize how much of a scam AIDS was until RFK Jr published “The Real Anthony Fauci” in 2021.

    Books like RFK’s (more than Jon Rappaport’s unfortunately) can trigger a global paradigm shift against the scientific establishment. These effects are clearly timely because the general populace wasn’t ready for such a shift in the late ’80’s when I believe AIDS Inc was first published. It took a cultural upheaval of lockdowns, destroyed businesses and a forced “vaccine” agenda to trigger this latest paradigm shift of awakening to the extreme levels of corruption in science and captured government agencies.

    I personally hope this leads to a full rejection of the frauds behind the germ theory of disease and a full embrace of the importance of the terrain theory. The work of Antoine Bechampe needs to be understood. He was an adversary of Louis Pasteur and published numerous experiments to debunk the germ theories of disease put forth by Pasteur.

    These concepts have been exponentiated in the concepts of viral cause of disease as exposed quite articulately by Drs. Andrew Kaufman, Stefan Lanka and Thomas Cowan among others.

    When the realization that pretty much all peer-reviewed scientific journals are in on a fraud that skews science towards one or another political direction it’s obvious we can’t rely on it for anything.

    In closing, will the collapse of science and medicine we are witnessing right now be just part of the ultimate collapse of our industrial civilization?

    I don’t know the answer to that but it sure seems like the general public opinion is very concerned about this type of question and is now rejecting the media narratives that have driven society for far too long. Regardless of where some indoctrinated “truthers” may be in their life path it’s important to realize that many that may be in some ways incorrect about what they believe are often well meaning and not intentionally trying to deceive you.

    Since this was a rather serious post I’ll lighten this up a bit with a funny parody of a Beach Boys song by The Babylon Bee:

    [iframe style=”border: none;” src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/7e7kjtR58lwB/” width=”640″ height=”360″ frameborder=”0″ scrolling=”no” data-mce-src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/7e7kjtR58lwB/” data-mce-style=”border: none;” /]

    Here’s our video channel so you can see the videos we post almost daily:

    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    Please share your thoughts below and share this with anyone you feel would benefit from reading it.

    Featured Photo By DES Daughter
    Liar Image courtesy of: id-iom
    Fauci Caricature Image courtesy of: DonkeyHotey
    911 Inside Job Image courtesy of: worldgathering

  • Graphene Based Microchips Are Not New

    Graphene Based Microchips Are Not New

    Semiconductors of our “current” generation which are used in common computers and electronics are silicone based chips. These have certain limits on speed as well as limits on miniaturization in nanotech.

    Now with all the attention that the Covid jabs have brought to graphene oxide and graphene based technology there hasn’t been enough attention on the development of graphene based microchips (and even nanochips).

    Graphene transistors have been in development for many years and the connection to biotech has probably been there from the beginning due to the hurdles in developing nano sized circuitry. A team at Stanford University in 2013 came up with a method of “building” nano-sized graphene transistors using strands of DNA as a template:

    “The loose carbon atoms stayed close to where they broke free from the DNA strands, and so they formed ribbons that followed the structure of the DNA,” Yap said.

    So part one of the invention involved using DNA to assemble ribbons of carbon. But the researchers also wanted to show that these carbon ribbons could perform electronic tasks. So they made transistors on the ribbons.

    “We demonstrated for the first time that you can use DNA to grow narrow ribbons and then make working transistors,” Sokolov said.

    Fast forward to our present where GBH (graphene based hydrogels) are being used in both PCR test swabs as well as ingredients in “experimental” gene therapy injections. Gels in general are used as delivery systems and engineered specifically based on their purpose, in order to hold the integrity of the gel and melt when the payload is to be delivered. In the case of the swabs that may be rather simple based on temperature changes when inserted in order to deliver an ethylene oxide or graphene oxide poison.

    The Stanford paper further discussed DNA and the challenges of this method of building graphene structures and nano-circuits:

    The paper drew praise from UC Berkeley associate professor Ali Javey, an expert in the use of advanced materials and next-generation electronics.

    “This technique is very unique and takes advantage of the use of DNA as an effective template for controlled growth of electronic materials,” Javey said. “In this regard the project addresses an important research need for the field.”

    Bao said the assembly process needs a lot of refinement. For instance, not all of the carbon atoms formed honeycombed ribbons a single atom thick. In some places they bunched up in irregular patterns, leading the researchers to label the material graphitic instead of graphene.

    Of course this was 2013 and years of research and refinement may have ironed out some of those hurdles.

    But if it didn’t fix all of them could it explain some of the clotting experienced by many of the jabbed?

    Now personally I don’t believe that it’s this simple but more likely the result of GBH programmed for self-assembly using metals and minerals found in our blood to create the structures and synthetic biology (synbio) found in the clots. But experiments can also go awry and we really don’t know how perfected these technologies were before this massive experiment was unleashed on humanity.

    Keep in mind that one of the reasons this research on graphene was going on at Stanford in 2013 and elsewhere is that graphene has very interesting magnetic and electrical conductivity properties and can exhibit superconductivity characteristics giving it the potential to revolutionize the switching speed of microchips paving the way for low cost (?) quantum computers.

    What we are talking about here is speeds of 100 Gigahertz and possibly higher. These frequency ranges are desired by big tech because of the immense data carrying capacity at these ultra-high frequencies.

    Graphene also has very unique light absorption properties and actually has been shown to absorb light beyond it’s size and shape. Part of the effect is due to a phenomena called cyclotron resonance but I’ll avoid getting too geeky here and let you follow the referenced links if that’s your forte. Suffice it to say that the unique phenomena that graphene has involves literally trapping light giving it time to be absorbed, very unique:

    Light striking graphene is trapped and transformed into an ultraslow surface wave. These waves get “stuck” in graphene and stay there until they are absorbed. The more light graphene absorbs, the more it heats up and the more its resistance changes leading to a larger photosignal. Hence, the change in resistance of graphene under the action of light is a measure of its absorptivity.

    In the context of GBH (graphene based hydrogels) injected into humans as part of experimental gene therapy injections it begs the question of how these could be used as power sources by absorbing terahertz radiation in order to power nano-circuitry in experimental synthetic biology systems attempting to create artificial neural networks.

    In this regime graphene is expected to be a super absorber. That is, it will not only capture light from an area larger than its geometric size, it will be able to capture light from an area larger than the square of the wavelength. The anomalously low plasmon velocity in magnetized graphene creates all the prerequisites for this.

    Why is this important?

    A number of reasons actually but briefly to touch on one area, we use light signaling in our intracellular communication networks (Pollack 2013) and this mechanism could potentially be hijacked with various nano-technology including graphene based hydrogels both for powering graphene based nano-circuits as well as using these for light emitted neural signaling.

    I guess we will see where this leads because obviously this is a deep topic but I can only go so far in this post.

    The group at La Quinta Columna discussed this topic here on this video:

    With all this discussion of graphene based hydrogels it seems important to mention the work of Gerald Pollack and his 2013 book “The Fourth Phase of Water” where he makes a well documented scientific argument for living cellular water as a “gel” in biological systems as well as detailing the associated communication networks.

    Personally I find it quite interesting, and not just coincidental that he published this groundbreaking work as the “revolution” in the development of graphene based gels was gaining serious momentum.

    I hope this report wasn’t too deep in the weeds and gave you some jumping off points to research further.

    More on these subjects will be covered in the future

    Please share this to your friends that may be able to gain some insight from it in all the places you like to share things.

     

    As usual our videos can be found here where you can subscribe on our bitchute channel:

    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    Stanford Source: https://engineering.stanford.edu/magazine/article/stanford-scientists-use-dna-assemble-transistor-graphene
    Graphene Light Absorption reference: https://phys.org/news/2022-02-abnormally-strong-absorption-graphene.html

  • Are Transmitted Toxins Polluting Human Blood?

    Are Transmitted Toxins Polluting Human Blood?

    The topic that’s been called “shedding” may not be a phenomenon of literal shedding of viral particles (most likely it’s nothing of the sort) but instead may in fact be an energetic effect of exuded nano particles which populate the perimeter of the human organism.

    Think of this perimeter akin to what’s often referred to energetically as “the aura” but also consider that the skin, being the largest human organ, is also one of the organs that expels toxins.

    So we are constantly “shedding” skin particles along with other toxins that we may be effectively eliminating.

    Does this mean that we are also absorbing expelled micro and nano-toxins from other humans?

    This new stage of blood microscopy by Dr. Phillippe Van Welbergen sure seems to indicate some sort of nano-infiltration of toxins passing from human to human. This interview is a bit long but it’s worth your time exploring to see the reality we are facing:

    So what is this stuff that’s brewing in the blood?

    Well if you’ve followed our work here at KnowingTheTruth.com for awhile you probably can guess what my suspicion is. I believe this is a phenomenon of synthetic biology (synbio) which is already a $10BN sub-market of molecular biology. How it’s used in experimental injections is a whole other story but you may find these previous articles interesting Is Synthetic Biology Clogging Blood Vessels? and Monkeypox, Venom Peptides or Synthetic Biology?

    If this is a manifestation of synthetic biology (synbio) there’s still a lot to be learned about how potentially to detox it and get through this.

    Anyway, let’s look at some of the photos from this video here.

    These are pretty much in the order that they are shown in the video.

    To be clear this is the blood of unvaccinated individuals that were exposed to vaccinated people but live a relatively healthy lifestyle. It’s rather difficult to ascertain exactly what the doctor’s reference to a “healthy lifestyle” actually means so exposure to 5G, WiFi and other environmental toxins can’t be ruled out.

    Bottom line this is unhealthy blood with very unnatural toxins such as graphene oxide and other structures that appear to be self assembling.

    This is some of the worst rouleau formation I’ve seen in blood images:

    This was described as a particle of graphene oxide:

    And these dots are reduced graphene oxide:

    It kind of looks like the graphene oxide nanospheres grow spermlike tails and in some cases attach together.

    What are these spermlike double headed structures?

    Are they then growing into these octopus like structures?

     

    On this topic here’s an interesting recent interview with Dr Robert Young on the topic of “shedding” and blood clots:

    And here’s an interview with Dr Jane Ruby and Mike Adams on related topics. They are discussing lab testing of the synthetic clots being reported by whistleblower embalmers who have found these as likely cause of death:

    While this video is at best only loosely related to synthetic biology, it is about the vax and children (discussion with Steve Kirsch) and it’s been a very popular since we uploaded it last week so you might find it useful:

    As usual you can find our videos and subscribe to our Bitchute channel here:

    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    Please do your part and share this post with everyone you can to get this information out and help put a stop to the medical cabal that sure seems to be trying to depopulate humans off this planet.

  • Is Synthetic Biology Clogging Blood Vessels?

    Is Synthetic Biology Clogging Blood Vessels?

    The concept of synthetic biology is foreign to most but it’s been a deep area of research in secret projects for many decades probably first seen by most in the phenomenon called Morgellons disease.

    This syndrome, largely shrugged off by most doctors, involves strange fibers which come out of the skin of it’s victims. It’s often associated with Lyme disease, or we could also say that many people afflicted with Morgellons symptoms have had Lyme also at some point in the past.

    All that being said I personally believe the concept of synthetic biology to be much more than just morgellons and represent a tenacious attack on human biology and specifically targeting the phenomena of epigenetics.

    The field of epigenetics is considered by some to be born out of the failure of the human genome project. It’s all about the vast array of environmental conditions (even as far reaching as consciousness and perception) affects the expression of genes and thus human (and other organism’s) health.

    There are plenty of extensive writings on Epigenetics that you can reference to dig into that topic more such as Epigenetics: The Death of the Genetic Theory of Disease Transmission by Joel D Wallach, Ma Lan and Gerhard N Schrauzer 2014 so we will keep the topic here focused on the concept of Synthetic Biology and current topics.

    What is synthetic biology and how does it relate to the field of Epigenetics?

    This is a rather complex subject but we’ll try to keep it simple for starters…

    Consider the example of a simple bacteria which is genetically modified to produce a specific protein. You can think of this as a biological factory for a protein. Sounds somewhat harmless so far, right? So far this is a concept that is used extensively in molecular biology for product manufacturing especially when it’s a simple protein that needs to be manufactured.

    It sounds rather innocent so far but now that we’ve covered the basics let’s dive a bit deeper…

    Normal DNA forms a two strand helix but we’re already at the point in the world of synthetic biology (also called synbio) where organisms have been modified to carry triple and quadruple stranded DNA that is passed to their microbial offspring. These extra strands of genetic material can literally be silicone along with other nano-metals and carry altered codons (genetic building blocks) that will pass on these alterations and build nano assemblages and structures in the resulting organism.

    Can you see how this can add a huge can of worms to this subject? What we are talking about is a merging of biotechnology with nanomaterials which opens up a new era of toxic bio-nanotech.

    You can think of synthetic biology as an offshoot of genetic engineering and molecular biology. Personally I think of it more like their evil step-sister.

    Keep in mind some of the most advanced natural doctors involved in unraveling such research as triple stranded DNA were cut short by suspicious deaths. Dr Jeff Bradstreet and Nicholas Gonzalez (both deceased in 2015) were likely murdered just prior to publishing their research connecting triple stranded DNA from Autistic children who had all been vaccinated with vaccines containing fetal cell lines. This just scratches the surface of these good doctors research which also involved the enzyme nagalase in infant vaccination.

    There was arguably a huge failure in the human genomics project (billions spent and barely a disease cured) as it became clear that plenty of things in our environment can manipulate the expression of our genetic code. Some of us consider the aftermath of this the beginning of a new era in a war on our genetic code. It can be roughly interpreted as a war between the Eugenicists and the Epigeneticists and unfortunately where those two ideologies meet there seems to be a lot of conflict of interest.

    Computers can now sequence genetic code and it can then be programmed into gene modifying drugs and injections. These can also be engineered into synthetic nano-materials designed for specific alteration of genetic expression (epigenetics) and genetic modification (genetic engineering) and because they are nano-sized these can be aerosolized and spread throughout our environment.

    This sure puts a new twist on the concept of allergy to airborne pollen.

    I personally live in an area known for tenacious pollen this time of year (spring/summer) and all I can say about that is this year seems to be quite unique. It’s got a lot of people scratching their heads and still thinking of the ancient concepts of “I caught this bug from so and so” stuck in what I consider the contagion mythos.

    Anyway, there is far too little regulation of these industries of synthetic biology which is apparently over a $10 billion industry already (not including the vaccine industry!) and we are at a crossroads in this time where these fields of science are being rolled out with no oversight.

    Those following real science in our current time also are well aware that (genetic code) injections are being rolled out that have zero liability (by falsely being called “vaccines”). These products likely involve some sort of secret synthetic biology. We can see this based on the reactions that have been surfacing among those who have subjected themselves to this grand human experiment.

    Is synthetic biology an explanation for the massive upsurge in “blood clots” and what is being described as “SADS” (Sudden Adult Death Syndrome)?

    Well what we observe from the whistleblower embalmers are clearly NOT “blood clots” in that they are not clots of blood but in fact white structural materials that look more like silicone and may in fact be some sort of synthetic biology that has self assembly capabilities.

    What if a genetic code modification caused your cells to produce a synthetic protein instead of the normal proteins that the ribosomes are supposed to produce and the process went haywire? What if this happened mostly in your blood vessels and it happened quicker in younger people who had more active circulation? Could this result in a surge of youthful death (labeled “SADS” to brush it off by the controlled media) among athletes and other young people that were part of an experimental new gene therapy injection? Could this also mean that older individuals could have the same thing building in their tissue just at a slower pace?

    While there is not yet proof that this is in fact a phenomena of “synthetic biology” after doing extensive research on this subject I believe ultimately it will be proven that the phenomenon of “self-assembling nano-particles” in the jabbed are synonymous with “synthetic biology” and this should help us understand what we are dealing with in order to move towards some sort of resolution in the future to avoid the transhumanist future that elite globalists seem hell bent on pushing humanity towards in their Eugenic “Human 2.0” Agenda 2030.

    And clearly the regulators are not concerned with your health when they write off all these deaths and go ahead and give EUA approval to a Moderna product for children as young as 6 months old! If that’s not a crime I sure don’t know what is.

    We will cover more on this subject in the future but let’s just conclude this post with some recent research into massive vascular clots that have been exuded from the dead jabbed victims and exposed by courageous embalmer Richard Hirschman. I urge you to keep the concept of synthetic biology in your mind when investigating this research for yourself.

    Part 1 live microscopy of clots:

    [iframe width=”640″ height=”360″ scrolling=”no” frameborder=”0″ style=”border: none;” src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/7zszXf27fflX/” data-mce-src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/7zszXf27fflX/” data-mce-style=”border: none;” /]

    Part 2 discussion with urgent care doctor who has seen this phenomenon in his practice:

    [iframe width=”640″ height=”360″ scrolling=”no” frameborder=”0″ style=”border: none;” src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/TatinnI90Xey/” data-mce-src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/TatinnI90Xey/” data-mce-style=”border: none;” /]

    Part 3 discussion with embalmer Richard Hirschman:

    [iframe width=”640″ height=”360″ scrolling=”no” frameborder=”0″ style=”border: none;” src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/vUbpBY6It74r/” data-mce-src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/vUbpBY6It74r/” data-mce-style=”border: none;” /]

    Part 4 discussion with Dr Jane Ruby:

    [iframe width=”640″ height=”360″ scrolling=”no” frameborder=”0″ style=”border: none;” src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/tK2bieZflwjN/” data-mce-src=”https://www.bitchute.com/embed/tK2bieZflwjN/” data-mce-style=”border: none;” /]

    As usual these videos can be accessed directly on our Bitchute channel where you can subscribe to get notified when we upload new videos quite frequently:

    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    Reference for slide photos: https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-06-12-blood-clots-microscopy-suddenly-died.html

    Thanks for reading. Please share this and get this out because due to shadowbanning we rely on your sharing to get the word out!

  • Who Is Controlled Opposition?

    Who Is Controlled Opposition?

    This topic of “Controlled Opposition” is a big can of worms and some of the videos I’ve been watching and posting lately have been digging into this philosophically in ways that I feel are worth articulating here…

    We did our first episode of MediaPuppets on this topic so I’ll embed that video on the bottom of this post.

    No matter where you are in your belief system it’s pretty easy to see that the mainstream narrative on Covid-19 has been falling apart for quite some time. The idea that “you should just get your vax and things will go back to normal” or at this point “get your booster and things will (finally) go back to normal” is largely being dismissed and this is even showing in the mainstream media these days.

    The narrative has been falling apart for quite some time but now it’s just patently obvious.

    Consider this recent story…

    So clearly the narrative is falling apart if pharma people are getting in serious trouble for falsifying vaccination records. Clearly the big wigs on the top are not taking these jabs but still trying to make you feel you should.

    When it comes to “Controlled Opposition” I believe there are many layers to the concept.

    At this point I break those down in two basic groups:

    • Economically Controlled
    • Philosophically (ideologically) Controlled
    • Blackmail Controlled

    For the purpose of focus, in this post we will focus on the first two and leave blackmail for other discussions.

    It’s my estimation that when most people think of “Controlled Opposition” (i.e. “Is this guy controlled opposition?”) think of someone who is paid to appose the narrative in a certain way. Paid opposition as a method of slowing down an inevitable collapse of a psychological narrative that is bound to fail as the truth spreads.

    So “they” (globalists, etc.) know that with so many people getting sick and dying from a novel experimental injection that was never tested on animals and only fraudulently “tested” on humans where the real results were actually hidden (and are finally coming out) that they will only be able to hide this reality for so long.

    They’ll use censorship in big-tech, gaslighting and big media for all their power but having certain doctors steering the alternative narrative can never hurt, right?

    Why not have some “alternative” doctors steer the narrative away from the topic of “bio-weapons” designed to kill and steer more towards the already accepted “side affects” of the vax such as myocarditis and other vascular conditions. This is sensible if you are an evil globalist with a penchant for depopulation and you want to delay your inevitable hanging in a Nuremberg 2.0 crimes against humanity trial.

    But what about the other method of control?

    After all when someone has been so indoctrinated into a particular viewpoint (case in point “the germ theory of disease”) it can be very difficult to steer them away from this view. It can go so far as defending their theories regardless of a lack of evidence. So this lack of proof of their viewpoint can be waved right in front of their face and they still won’t see it because they are so deeply entrenched in a particular bias.

    Lately there’s been some discussion going on indirectly between Dr Thomas Cowan and Dr Andrew Kaufman with Dr Peter McCullough and Dr Robert Malone. Here’s an example shown in a few short video clips so please bear in mind that these were from two distinct interviews and they didn’t actually engage in a direct debate.

    First we have Dr Robert Malone defending the viral theory of disease in the case of Covid and calling the virus an “agent” that has been identified and isolated:

    Next we have a clarification and an interesting metaphor from Dr Thomas Cowan about the actual methods used in viral “isolation” which are in reality not isolation at all:

    What follows is some defense against the idea that covid was simply a rebranding of the flu by Dr Peter McCullough with a few words also from Dr Robert Malone:

    Next is an explanation from Dr Andrew Kaufman explaining why it benefits the establishment to continue the narrative of a deadly and scary virus in order to spread fear to move the population towards Agenda 2030. He also explains Dr Stefan Lanka’s research where he produced cytopathic results without a virus just from the toxic soup of the “isolation” process:

    Of course one of the most common questions that comes up in the “Terrain Theory” debate is how other diseases that are thought to be caused by a virus actually caused?

    While this seems on the face of it to be a good question there’s an obvious answer which is articulated quite well right here:

    Open minds in medicine are quite rare because it’s hard to go against the grain in any endeavor especially in medicine when all of your peers are so indoctrinated into pharmaceutical medicine and the paradigm of pharma one medicine for every disease.

    This ideological control is one that doesn’t get the attention that it needs because this type of “Controlled Opposition” doesn’t even know they are acting in this way. They may be so indoctrinated into their particular paradigm that they don’t even know they are being manipulated with that paradigm. This is why paradigm shifts are so important.

    The bias of indoctrination creates the lens that you see the world through and the danger of this type of controlled opposition is that the individual doesn’t even know they are controlled by such a bias until something flips the switch and they have a paradigm switch. These days it’s often referred to as a “red pill”.

    Of course this digs at the core of terrain theory vs germ theory and whether “virus isolation” techniques actually qualify as “isolation” at all because of the toxic soup that is added to “culture” the small amounts of so called virus that are thus being cultured.

    I believe this is a very important debate and one that should involve a direct conversation between these apposing groups, that has not happened yet…

    However as mentioned above, Dr Stefan Lanka has done an experiment where he performed a “control” viral isolation where no virus was added to the culture and it looked basically the same after the toxic soup was cultured. Neither McCullough or Malone have commented directly on Dr Lanka’s work that I know of but please share a comment below if you know otherwise.

    So who is part of the controlled opposition?

    Dr Peter McCullough?

    Dr Robert Malone?

    Dr Ryan Cole?

    As Dr Tom Cowan so astutely points out that it’s a good habit to avoid questioning other peoples motives unless they expressly articulate those motives because otherwise it’s basically pure speculation because we can’t get inside their head.

    So while anyone can speculate that one or more of these doctors are part of an effort of controlled opposition based on the history of actions of each of these doctors risking their careers in the last couple years it’s more likely that they would be part of the ideological / philosophically controlled opposition than that they are being paid to oppose the narrative.

    But then again, maybe others out there have additional information on this that would indicate otherwise.

    What do you think?

    Which, if any of these doctors do you think is controlled opposition? And which type of control do you believe they are under?

    And where in this story does Monkeypox fit in?

    It is pretty clear that the skin lesions of shingles and other skin conditions that are a hallmark of immune dysfunction are similar to skin lesions of monkeypox. Immune suppression in the AIDS era in the 1980’s is now known to have been a result of immune-suppressive pharmaceuticals such as AZT and others. These were known to cause a skin condition called kaposi-sarcoma where the skin growths would stop when the patients were taken off the drugs.

    Knowing this would you think it would be productive to question the immune-suppressive qualities of a novel (new) experimental gene-therapy injection that is being falsely promoted and advertised as a “vaccine”?

    Could a condition being called “monkeypox” and blamed on skin to skin contact spread actually be a result of an adverse reaction to a gene-therapy injection?

    With the proper “Controlled Opposition” could the threat of monkeypox be used as a method to continue the narrative of the vaccine agenda in order to continue to push injections despite what is obvious to some of us as blatant injection reactions?

    Since this was a pretty serious post I’m going to close with a pretty funny video called “Gaslighting Me with PSYOPS” from Dr Clown at www.DrClown.com

    All our videos can be found on our bitchute channel where you can also subscribe for the latest videos:
    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    And the MediaPuppets on “Controlled Opposition”:

    Please share this post with your friends and spread the word. Also go ahead and subscribe below to get weekly notifications of our latest new content.

    Featured Photo By DES Daughter

  • Monkeypox, Venom Peptides or Synthetic Biology?

    Monkeypox, Venom Peptides or Synthetic Biology?

    Anyone that is still on the institutional media right now is likely freaking out about monkeypox. Is this worth the fuss or just more fear propaganda?

    Dr. Jennifer McQuiston of the CDC confirmed a case of monkeypox after four orthopox cases in New York City, Florida, and Utah. Monkeypox is part of the family of viruses belonging to orthopox.

    Also part of the orthopox family is chickenpox which in my youth we had kids parties where we all TRIED to get chickenpox because it’s best to get when you are young and as you get older you are more likely to get larger pustules that are more likely to lead to scarring.

    Dr. David Heymann, former head of the WHO emergencies department, said the leading theory is that the infection began in Spain and Belgium with sexual transmission among homosexual and bisexual men at two raves.

    “We know monkeypox can spread when there is close contact with the lesions of someone who is infected, and it looks like sexual contact has now amplified that transmission,” he added.

    So the media is hyping up something that is being spread from promiscuous orgy type of sex parties?

    And then using it as justification for receiving their previously ordered ~35 million doses of a new monkeypox vaccine? Please keep in mind that all these new “vaccines” are 99% likely to be mRNA vaccines and if prior actions dictate future results then we can expect these to be loaded with all sorts of nano-technology, graphene oxide, PEG and other toxic ingredients.

    Sounds appetizing, right?

    I’ll sure be lining up for that one! Not!

    But let’s dig a bit deeper because even if these exotic diseases are few and far between let’s dig into the concept of the engineered bio-weapon and synthetic biology.

    You’ve likely heard about “gain of function” research which has been highlighted in the media in these last few years since the “launch” of the covid psyop.

    I personally believe this is an additional psyop in order to obfuscate your attention away from militarization of synthetic biology which has been in development for decades at this point since the advent of carbon nano-tube (CNT) technology and has evolved into self-assembling nano-technology that is actually being tested currently in the largest clinical trial of human beings with the so called “Covid-19 vaccines”.

    Self assembling nano-technology and the emerging synthetic biology technologies were first seen in the largely discredited Morgellons disease phenomenon which is commonly associated with Lyme disease as well as Geoengineered Chemtrail spraying.

    Here’s some photos that put the above in perspective:

    Look, I could write for days on this subject but then it would be a book and not a post on this website but the bottom line is that nanotech development has skyrocketed in these last few years and while media talks all about “gain of function” virus development as the “weapons” of the future they sure don’t seem to be mentioning carbon nanotubes, nanodiamonds, nanoelectronics, nanoelectrode arrays, nanobots or smart dust. They also don’t seem to mention IoNT (internet of nano-things) or IoB (internet of bodies) and how it has the potential to “rewire” the human neural network for a transhumanist Ray Kurzweil style Human 2.0 and that this technology IS NOT science fiction but actively in development.

    To tie this all back to the title of this post and the subject of monkeypox. It has been circulating that many of the pictures of monkeypox that are being used in the various reports are literally 30 year old photos!

    I am sure not concerned about monkeypox but could CNT technology be merged with other toxic nano-technology and injected to produce horrible pox-like pustules in humans?

    Absolutely.

    Does that mean they are doing that yet?

    Not necessarily but they sure know how to scare people into submission and take all their rights away.

    And there is also a specific reason that I also included venom peptides in the title of this post…

    Regardless of how much even the alternative media has torn up the idea that venom technology has been used in pharmaceutical products, the fact remains that they are as exemplified by companies like VenomTech.com and others that bank these peptides for drug development use.

    It is my belief after tons of reading and researching on this subject that the venom peptides are part of the driving force of these gene therapy injections which may drive the CNT or other carbon nano-tech and/or mRNA (and snake mRNA components are apparently also in common use for these products due to it’s persistent molecular integrity) into the cells of human guinea pigs or other animals that are used for testing such products.

    More on these subjects will be forthcoming here on KnowingTheTruth.com

    To close I’ll share some of the recent related videos from our Bitchute channel which you can subscribe to here:

    https://www.bitchute.com/channel/knowingthetruth/

    On the Greg Reese Report: The Truth About Monkeypox

    Going deep with the Venom technology here is a two part video interview with Dr Tau Braun on this subject.

    Part 1:

    Part 2:

    And here is a recent interview with Karen Kingston and Maria Zeee that is a bit of a bigger picture overview including the monkeypox scare:

    Dr Jane Ruby on the Monkeypox and related vaccines:

    (this video above is currently processing – if it doesn’t play please check back later and it should play)

    While not really related to monkeypox this video about the recent Pfizer FOIA data dump is important enough to put in as a footer to this post:

    Please share your thoughts in the comments below and share this post with anyone you feel will get something out of it.

     

    Quotes from: https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/biden-warns-americans-to-be-concerned-about-spread-of-monkeypox/

    Images reference: https://imageevent.com/firesat/strangedaysstrangeskies?z=3&c=4&n=1&m=